tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307187040250193857.post9118892863462091661..comments2024-03-20T03:33:22.357-07:00Comments on Skeptophilia: Ketchum study redux, and why peer review isn't a conspiracyGordon Bonnethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06003472005971594466noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307187040250193857.post-30003519359941451422012-12-10T09:26:23.183-08:002012-12-10T09:26:23.183-08:00Actually, the discovery of bigfoot would be much m...Actually, the discovery of bigfoot would be much more revolutionary than your average large hominid, because it would also require an explanation of where it found food, how it had managed to exist for so long without ever one being killed by a hunter, or remains being found, or captured on a game camera, or...<br /><br />It would be like discovering that an elephant had lived in Grand Central Station since 1904 and somehow nobody noticed. The implications go beyond biology.Tyler Torkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11460706772136362593noreply@blogger.com