Skeptophilia (skep-to-fil-i-a) (n.) - the love of logical thought, skepticism, and thinking critically. Being an exploration of the applications of skeptical thinking to the world at large, with periodic excursions into linguistics, music, politics, cryptozoology, and why people keep seeing the face of Jesus on grilled cheese sandwiches.
Showing posts with label Akhenaten. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Akhenaten. Show all posts

Saturday, June 4, 2016

Tut tut

Yesterday we heard about how some oddly-shaped markings on Pluto are evidence of an extraterrestrial base, or possibly the home of intelligent fungus-creatures, as hath been prophesied in the writings of H. P. Lovecraft.  Today, we find out that...

... King Tutankhamun was half-alien.

The whole thing comes up because of a cool archaeological discovery, that a dagger found in the hoard buried with King Tut had a blade forged from a meteorite.  The paper describing the research, written by Daniela Cornelli et al. and published last week in Meteoritics and Planetary Science, had the following to say:
Scholars have long discussed the introduction and spread of iron metallurgy in different civilizations.  The sporadic use of iron has been reported in the Eastern Mediterranean area from the late Neolithic period to the Bronze Age.  Despite the rare existence of smelted iron, it is generally assumed that early iron objects were produced from meteoritic iron.  Nevertheless, the methods of working the metal, its use, and diffusion are contentious issues compromised by lack of detailed analysis.  Since its discovery in 1925, the meteoritic origin of the iron dagger blade from the sarcophagus of the ancient Egyptian King Tutankhamun (14th C. BCE) has been the subject of debate and previous analyses yielded controversial results.  We show that the composition of the blade (Fe plus 10.8 wt% Ni and 0.58 wt% Co), accurately determined through portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometry, strongly supports its meteoritic origin.  In agreement with recent results of metallographic analysis of ancient iron artifacts from Gerzeh, our study confirms that ancient Egyptians attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of precious objects.  Moreover, the high manufacturing quality of Tutankhamun's dagger blade, in comparison with other simple-shaped meteoritic iron artifacts, suggests a significant mastery of ironworking in Tutankhamun's time.
Which is pretty darn cool.  The dagger is gorgeous, too:


But of course, "cool archaeological discovery" isn't enough for some people.  The fact that King Tutankhamun had a dagger made from a meteorite (or at least was buried with one) has to mean that the Boy King himself had ancestry from outer space.

Tut's father was the oddball King Akhenaten, who attempted to abolish the national polytheistic religion and replace it with a more-or-less monotheistic worship of the Sun ("Aten"), with predictable results.  The road to popularity does not come from a political figure saying, "You all need to change what you believe right now."  (In fact, the only time I've ever heard of a state religion being decided by decree, peacefully, was the Christianization of Iceland in the year 1,000 C.E., in which the people let the leaders decide if they were going to follow the Christian god or the old Norse gods.  The leaders decided on Christianity, and the entire nation submitted to baptism without a drop of blood shed.)

Be that as it may, Akhenaten was an odd dude.  In depictions of him -- those that survived the wholesale re-conversion of Egypt to the old polytheistic religion at his death -- he is even a strange-looking fellow, with a long, thin face, skinny arms, and a pot belly.  So it's not to be wondered at that the aliens-and-spaceships cadre decided that he couldn't possibly be human.

Pharaoh Akhenaten [image courtesy of the Wikimedia Commons]

So we have the following appearing over at the wonderful site Ancient UFO:
One of the most interesting characteristics of Akhenaten, is that he is always depicted with a long, elongated skull.  Most Egyptian scholars have attributed this to artistic style peculiar to his reign.  Surely though, it is more likely that he actually had an enlarged cranium?  Artistic depictions of Akhenaten, usually show him with an elongated head, wide hips and a round belly.  It has been suggested by researchers that these features are attributed to a disorder called Froehlich’s Syndrome.  This disorder is typified by an elongated face and an androgynous figure...  [But] could this be because Akhenaten was perhaps actually extraterrestrial?
And now, they say, we have the clincher; a dagger whose blade came from outer space.

The problem is, the dagger was made from a meteorite.  I.e., a piece of space rock that struck the Earth.  The ancient Egyptians didn't have to go out into space to mine it, or anything.  The fact that they used meteoritic iron just means they were clever about using stuff they found, not that they were aliens.  King Tut's having a dagger with a blade made from a meteorite doesn't mean that he was half-alien any more than my possession of a t-shirt made in China makes me Chinese.

Of course, the problem is the usual one; the woo-woos in question had already decided that Akhenaten was an alien, so the dagger was just one more bit of confirmation bias in their favor.  So my saying all of this certainly won't stop the speculation.  Look for a highly scientific documentary on Tutankhamun's alien ancestry to show up on the This Really Isn't History Channel soon.

Monday, December 2, 2013

Obama-hotep

Toward more precise speech, I'm going to highlight today the difference between two words that are often used interchangeably: "doubtful" and "skeptical."

To be skeptical means to have an open mind; to approach a claim without bias (insofar as that is possible), and to evaluate it on the twin bases of evidence and logic.  A skeptical approach to (for example) ghosts would be to consider the available photographs, recordings, electromagnetic traces, and so on, and evaluate those based on looking at not only the possibility that they were produced by spirits, but other explanations as well.  We can't start from the conclusion that "these data must mean that ghosts exist;" we must weigh the likelihood of the evidence coming instead from human perceptual biases (e.g. pareidolia), equipment error, natural phenomena, or outright hoaxing.  To be a skeptic, therefore, simply means being an honest scientist.

To be doubtful, on the other hand, means to look at something and say, "Wow, this is unadulterated horse waste."

While I try to lean in the direction of the former as often as I can, I was pushed toward the latter by a website a friend sent me, with the provocative title, "Is Obama a Clone?"  I have observed a general trend, which is that any time someone headlines an article with a question, the answer is almost always "NO."  But I decided to be skeptical at least long enough to read the first paragraph, wherein I found that the author is not claiming that Obama is just a clone.  No, that would be silly.

The author is claiming that Obama is the clone of the Pharaoh Akhenaten.

For those of you who aren't Egyptophiles, let me give you a little bit of background.  Akhenaten was born Amenhotep, some time around 1370-ish B.C.E., and succeeded to the throne as Amenhotep IV in the early 1350s.  He had two wives -- hardly unusual in those days -- Kiya, and the famous Nefertiti.  But outside of his amorous pursuits, he made it clear right away that he wasn't going to do things the standard way.  He tried to abolish the old polytheistic pantheon (Ra, Horus, Anubis, Thoth, Isis, and the rest of the gang) and replace it with a more-or-less monotheistic worship of the god Aten (the sun).  He changed his name to Akhenaten, meaning "Aten is Effective," which is kind of unimpressive as a slogan for a god, don't you think?

Evidently, the Egyptian people by and large agreed with me, because when he died in 1336, his successor Smenkhkare ordered his buddies to go around and basically erase all traces that Akhenaten ever existed.  And the Ancient Egyptians complied with a vengeance.  They chiseled out depictions of him, cut out his name from inscriptions, reinstated the old religion, and basically tried to pretend that he never happened.

Except that now, apparently, we have him back, living in the White House.

See the resemblance?  No, neither do I.

So, let's see what the author has to say about this claim, and I'll let you determine if we should be "skeptical" or "doubtful:"
If you are interested in both advanced technology and alien-based technology, you will probably be interested in the video clip [on this website].  It originates from www. FreemanTV.com and is about Freeman’s theory of the cloning of the US First Family from an ancient Egyptian (Pharaoh) bloodline.  This brief video will most likely stretch your imagination...  However, cloning technology is not new; and Freeman’s theory is actually possible.  With your inquiring mind, you probably already know about the alien connection to Egypt.  If this theory is true, are Obama and his family are part “gods” (i.e., aliens)?  If so, that, then, begs the question:  What is the purpose for their presence in the US White House?
Anyway, after an introduction like that, I had to watch the video.   Here are a few highlight quotes, in case you don't want to waste a valuable three minutes of your life that you will never, ever get back:
  • "Mummification preserves a cell for cloning.  All my life, I've known this, because I've studied ancient astronauts... even Time-Warner told me they could clone mummies."
  • "It's very interesting, to see the title the Secret Service gave this family [the Obamas]: renegade."
  • "And look at Michelle Obama's high school picture.  I didn't manipulate that photo one bit.  It's Queen Kiya."
  • "So I'm going to leave you with this thought, that perhaps our leaders have cloned this ancient bloodline of mummies."
So.  Yeah.  I only have one thing to add, which is:  WA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA *collapses onto floor*

What blows me away about this guy is that he can actually say all of this with a completely straight face, which either means that he is (1) a hell of an actor, or (2) batshit insane.  Either way, I really do not understand how anyone spouting this stuff can actually attract an audience -- but if you listen to the clip, you will hear that he is evidently speaking in front of a group, because you can hear them ooh-ing and aah-ing appreciatively every time he makes a "point."  And furthermore, another guy thought it was a plausible enough idea to link the video clip on his blog.  So this leads us to the disturbing conclusion that we have not just one wacko guy spouting nonsense, but a whole bunch of people so breathtakingly ignorant of science that they believe what he's saying.

So, there you have it: a claim that moves us from the balanced and thoughtful territory of "skepticism" right out across the thin ice of "doubt" and off into the turbulent seas of "outright ridicule."  I try to resist going in that direction when possible, I honestly do.  But here, I couldn't help myself -- so I tossed aside my measured and scientific evaluation of data, and just went straight for "Nope, he's a wingnut."

That's how much of a "renegade" I am.