We're misled by dozens of things, from simple failures of our perceptual or processing apparatus, to our preconceived notions and cognitive biases, to falling prey to others who want us to think a certain way. Science gives us a way around all of that; its understanding relies on data and evidence. What we thought beforehand, what someone else told us -- none of that matters.
Now, I'm not saying that science has no biases. There is no endeavor that is completely bias-free. However, if you want to find a way to the truth, based on the current best knowledge we have, science is the only game in town.
This comes up because of a paper released last week in the Journal of Information, Communication, Society that addresses a commonly-held belief, especially amongst those who are (like myself), "of a certain age;" that social media and the ubiquity of cellphones and other internet-connective devices are going to result in a generation of young adults who don't know how to interact with each other in person -- or, perhaps, who simply don't want to.
Note that this belief is usually founded on nothing but annoyance. Looking around a bus stop or a doctor's waiting room, and seeing all the faces glued to their Smart Phones, it's easy to imagine that it might be true. After all, it seems kind of logical, doesn't it? You stare at your phone rather than connecting to the people around you. Of course that's going to isolate you, right?
[image courtesy of the Wikimedia Commons]
[We present] two tests of the hypothesis that social media use decreases social interaction, leading to decreased well-being. Study 1 used the Longitudinal Study of American Youth (N = 2774), which is a national probability sample of Generation X, to test displacement over a three-year time period. Latent change scores were used to test associations among social media adoption in 2009, social media use in 2011, direct contact frequency across years, in relation to change in well-being. Although social media adoption in 2009 predicted less social contact in 2011, increased social media use between 2009 and 2011 positively predicted well-being. Study 2 used experience sampling with a combined community and undergraduate sample (N = 116). Participants reported on their social interactions and passive social media use (i.e., excluding chat via social media) five times a day over five days. Results indicate that social media use at prior times of day was not associated with future social interaction with close others or with future face-to-face interaction. Passive social media use at prior times predicted lower future well-being only when alone at prior times. Neither study supported the social displacement hypothesis.But... but... our intuition on this seemed so logical, didn't it? On the other hand, when I think back on my own misspent youth, my memory tells me otherwise. I was painfully shy, and to say I had no social life in high school is an understatement of colossal proportions. This was long before the days of Smart Phones and Facebook (hell, my students think it was long before the days of Gutenberg and the Printing Press). I can therefore guarantee that my own social isolation had nothing to do with social media, because it didn't exist. And my guess is that if there had been social media, at least it would have given me some way of interacting, other than my preferred method of getting beaten up in the gym locker room.
Jeffrey Hall, who co-authored the study, elaborated on its results. "It was not the case at all that social media adoption or use had a consistent effect on their direct social interactions with people," Hall said. "What was interesting was that, during a time of really rapid adoption of social media, and really powerful changes in use, you didn’t see sudden declines in people’s direct social contact. If the social-displacement theory is correct, people should get out less and make fewer of those phone calls, and that just wasn’t the case."
In fact, the use of social media didn't even affect who they chose to socialize with. "What we found was that people’s use of social media had no relationship to who they were talking to later that day and what medium they were using to talk to people later that day," Hall said. "Social media users were not experiencing social displacement. If they used social media earlier in the day, they were not more likely to be alone later. It’s also not the case that because they were using social media now, they were not interacting face to face later. … It doesn’t seem that, either within the same time period or projecting the future, that social media use indicates people not having close relationship partners in face-to-face or telephone conversation."
So science here gives us a chance to challenge our preconceived notions, and in this case finds that our tendency to rant about "kids these days" and "it wasn't like that back in my day" turns out to be false. The sad postscript, however, is that I don't expect this to change anyone's attitudes. It's like the study, released last year, that not only does spanking not work to change a child's behavior, it's associated with a host of mental problems later in life, including depression, suicide risk, and drug abuse.
After that study came out -- and it is one of several studies that have reached this conclusion -- there was an outpouring of outrage on social media that "the liberals are trying to stop us from disciplining our kids" and "kids these days are disrespectful and lazy, and wouldn't be that way if they were spanked for it" and (most often) "I was spanked all the time as a kid, and I turned out fine." Which proves that you can have controlled scientific studies out the wazoo, and it won't stop people from falling back on anecdote and personal experience and what they already believed.
Which is kind of distressing, now that I come to think of it.
Anyhow. If I can get one person to stop and reconsider what they think, and perhaps base their understanding on hard evidence, I'll have done my job. Now, y'all will have to excuse me, because it's been a while since I've checked Facebook. You never know what might have happened in my absence.