Despite gaining some traction, especially amongst athletes and bodybuilders, the "Paleo Diet" has been looked upon with a wry eye by actual dieticians. A survey of experts in the field, sponsored by CNN, placed the "Paleo Diet" as dead last in terms of support from peer-reviewed research and efficacy at promoting healthy weight loss.
But the "Paleo Diet" will sound like quantum physics, technical-science-wise, as compared to the latest diet to take the world of poorly-educated woo-woos by storm:
The "Werewolf Diet."
I wish I were making this up. I also wish, for different reasons, that it was what it sounded like -- that people who sign up find themselves, once a month, sprouting fur and fangs and running around naked and eating unsuspecting hikers. That, at least, would be entertaining.
[Image from Weird Tales (November 1941) is in the Public Domain]
But no such luck. The Werewolf Diet, however, does resemble being an actual werewolf in that (1) what you get to eat is tied to the phases of the Moon, (2) it more or less ruins your health, and (3) it completely fucks up any chance at a normal social life.
The site "Moon Connection" describes the whole thing in great detail, but they make a big point of their stuff being copyrighted material, so I'll just summarize so that you get the gist:
You have two choices, the "basic plan" or the "extended plan." On the "basic plan," you fast for 24 hours, either on the full Moon or the new Moon. You can, they say, "lose up to six pounds of water weight" by doing this, but why this is a good thing isn't clear.
The "extended plan," though, is more interesting. With the "extended plan," you fast during the full Moon, then eat a fairly normal diet during the waning part of the Moon cycle (with the addition of drinking eight glasses of water a day to "flush out toxins"). On the new Moon, you should fast again, only consuming dandelion tea or green tea (more toxin flushing). During the waxing part of the Moon cycle, you must be "disciplined" to fight your "food cravings," and avoid overeating. "Thickeners," such as sugar and fats, should be avoided completely, and you can't eat anything after 6 PM because that's when the Moon's light "becomes more visible."
Then you hit the full Moon and it all starts over again.
Well, let me just say that this ranks right up there with "downloadable medicines" as one of the dumbest things I have ever read. We have the whole "flushing toxins" bullshit -- as if your kidneys and liver aren't capable of dealing with endogenous toxic compounds, having evolved for millions of years to do just that. We're told, as if it's some sort of revelation, that our "food cravings will increase" after we've been consuming nothing but green tea for 24 hours. Then we are informed that the Moon's gravitational pull has an effect on us, because we're 60% water -- implying that contrary to what Isaac Newton said, the gravitational pull an object experiences depends not on its mass but on what it's made of. Or that your bloodstream experiences high tide, or something, I dunno. And also, the gravitational pull the Moon exerts upon you somehow depends on the phase it's in, because, apparently, the amount of light reflecting from the Moon's surface mysteriously alters its mass.
I mean, I'm not a dietician, but really. And fortunately, there are dieticians who agree. Keri Gans, a professional dietician and author of The Small Change Diet, said in an interview, "This diet makes me laugh. I don’t know if it’s the name or that people will actually believe it. Either way, it is nothing but another fad diet encouraging restriction. Restriction of food will of course lead to weight loss, but at what cost to the rest of your body? If only celebrities, once and for all, would start touting a diet plan that makes sense and is based on science."
Yes. If only. But unfortunately, fewer people have heard of Gans, and (evidently) the scientific method, than have heard of Madonna and Demi Moore, who swear by the Werewolf Diet. Not that Moore, especially, is some kind of pinnacle of rationality; she is a devotee of Philip Berg's "Kabbalah Centre," which preaches that "99% of reality cannot be accessed by the senses."
Nor, apparently, by logic and reason.
Interestingly enough, as I'm writing this it's just past the new Moon, so we're all supposed to be subsisting on dandelion tea. To which I answer: the hell you say. I'm off to get some bacon and eggs. Detoxify that, buddy.
I've loved Neil de Grasse Tyson's brilliant podcast StarTalk for some time. Tyson's ability to take complex and abstruse theories from astrophysics and make them accessible to the layperson is legendary, as is his animation and sense of humor.
If you've enjoyed it as well, this week's Skeptophilia book-of-the-week is a must-read. In Cosmic Queries: StarTalk's Guide to Who We Are, How We Got Here, and Where We're Going, Tyson teams up with science writer James Trefil to consider some of the deepest questions there are -- how life on Earth originated, whether it's likely there's life on other planets, whether any life that's out there might be expected to be intelligent, and what the study of physics tells us about the nature of matter, time, and energy.
Just released three months ago, Cosmic Queries will give you the absolute cutting edge of science -- where the questions stand right now. In a fast-moving scientific world, where books that are five years old are often out-of-date, this fascinating analysis will catch you up to where the scientists stand today, and give you a vision into where we might be headed. If you're a science aficionado, you need to read this book.
[Note: if you purchase this book using the image/link below, part of the proceeds goes to support Skeptophilia!]