It's hard for me to describe what I am feeling. Mostly, it's a deep, deep grief that something beautiful, something irreplaceable, is gone forever. It was a place of devotion, a building that had been lovingly cared for and added to for almost nine hundred years, an iconic symbol of the city of Paris.
And now it's gone.
I know that loss is part of the human condition, but this is a big one. It appears that there isn't even anyone to blame, to take our minds off the grief, as there was with 9/11; the best guess anyone has right now of the cause is an accident during renovation. That one blunder could deprive the world of something this grand is mind-boggling, but that's what seems to have happened as of the time I'm writing this.
[Image is licensed under the Creative Commons Diego Delso creator QS:P170,Q28147777, Paris Notre-Dame cathedral interior nave east 01d, CC BY 3.0]
And it always launches us into the if-only trap, doesn't it? When a chance set of circumstances led to the death of our beloved border collie Doolin a few years ago, I spent the next weeks trying to parse what we could have changed had we only seen ahead. Tiny differences -- waiting two minutes, leaving our house through a different door, taking a different path into our yard -- any one of those would have meant that she and that speeding car would not have been at the same place at the same time.
But we're not prescient, and all of those tiny events only add up in retrospect.
Every time something irrevocable occurs, from the minor to the overwhelming, I can't help thinking if only something could have been done differently. If only someone hadn't blundered, hadn't had a moment of carelessness, had been paying more attention.
And each time, I am brought to the reality that the if-onlys are pointless. It's done, it's over, it will never be again.
It's the scale of this one that's so horrible. Consider the love and wonder of the millions of tourists who visited Notre Dame; the ones (like myself) who wanted to go, always intended to go, but never did; the thousands who devoted their time, effort, and money to the upkeep and renovation of the structure; the countless devout Catholics who considered this a central icon of their deeply-held faith; and you have a glimmer of understanding of what people are feeling right now.
I keep going back to the news stories, watching the videos as if to make sure I've understood right, that Notre Dame is really gone. A part of me still can't quite believe it.
Of course, I still mourn the burning of the Great Library of Alexandria, so it may be a while before this wound heals.
Firefighters are still trying to save what they can, but the last word I heard was that even the vault might be in jeopardy. Realistically, I don't see how anything but the stone framework will remain standing, and probably not even all of that. And if they rebuild it, then what? What they create might well be beautiful and awe-inspiring, as the 9/11 memorial and the new World Trade Center are, but it won't be what it was. That will only exist in our remembrance -- and in our art, photography, and writing, which (after all) are our species's collective memory.
I'm not sure what else to say. It still seems surreal, a blow to our false confidence that the world will always remain as it is. I will be processing this for a long time, I think. But for now, I'm going to go look at some photographs of a treasure that is now lost forever.
Monday's post, about the institutionalized sexism in scientific research, prompted me to decide that this week's Skeptophilia book recommendation is Evelyn Fox Keller's brilliant biography of Nobel Prize-winning geneticist Barbara McClintock, A Feeling for the Organism.
McClintock worked for years to prove her claim that bits of genetic material that she called transposons or transposable elements could move around in the genome, with the result of switching on or switching off genes. Her research was largely ignored, mostly because of the attitudes toward female scientists back in the 1940s and 1950s, the decades during which she discovered transposition. Her male colleagues laughingly labeled her claim "jumping genes" and forthwith forgot all about it.
Undeterred, McClintock kept at it, finally amassing such a mountain of evidence that she couldn't be ignored. Other scientists, some willingly and some begrudgingly, replicated her experiments, and support finally fell in line behind her. She was awarded the 1983 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine -- and remains to this day the only woman who has received an unshared Nobel in that category.
Her biography is simultaneously infuriating and uplifting, but in the end, the uplift wins -- her work demonstrates the power of perseverance and the delightful outcome of the protagonist winning in the end. Keller's look at McClintock's life and personal struggles, and ultimate triumph, is a must-read for anyone interested in science -- or the role that sexism has played in scientific research.
[Note: If you purchase this book using the image/link below, part of the proceeds goes to support Skeptophilia!]
Post a Comment