A subject is feeling a real-time streaming feed from the Net of data for five seconds. Then, two buttons appear, and he has to make a choice. He doesn't know what's going on. He makes a choice, and he gets feedback after one second. Now, here's the thing: the subject has no idea what all the patterns mean, but we're seeing if he gets better at figuring out which button to press. He doesn't know that what we're feeding is real-time data from the stock market, and he's making buy and sell decisions. And the feedback is telling him whether he did the right thing or not. And what we're seeing is, can we expand the human umwelt so that he comes to have, after several weeks, a direct perceptual experience of the economic movements of the planet.
The wildest thing is that the peripheral you add doesn't have to be input; it can be output. Two different papers, both in the journal Science, have shown that you can add an output device, and like with the inputs -- all it takes is a little training.
In the first, "A Brain-Computer Interface that Evokes Tactile Sensations Improves Robotic Arm Control," test subjects have a computer interface device implanted into their brain, which then translates thoughts into movements of a robotic arm, analogous to what an intact neuromuscular system is doing to our actual arms. This has been doable for a while, but the advance in this study is that the robotic arm has sensors that provide feedback, again just like our own systems do when working properly. Think about picking up a coffee cup; you adjust the pressure and position of your grip because you're constantly getting feedback, like the temperature of the cup, the weight and balance, whether your fingers are hanging on well or slipping, and so forth.
Here, the feedback provided by the sensors on the robotic arm cut in half the time taken for doing an action without mishap! The brain once again picked up very quickly how to use the additional information to make the output go more smoothly.
In the second, people were trained with a "third thumb" -- an artificial extra digit strapped to the hand on the pinky-finger side. It's controlled by pressure sensors under the toes, so you're using your feet to move something attached to your hand while simultaneously using your brain to control your other hand movements, which seems impossibly complicated. But within a day, test subjects could perform tasks like building a tower from wooden blocks using the augmented hand... even when distracted or blindfolded!
Study author Paulina Kieliba, of University College - London's Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, said, "Body augmentation could one day be valuable to society in numerous ways, such as enabling a surgeon to get by without an assistant, or a factory worker to work more efficiently. This line of work could revolutionize the concept of prosthetics, and it could help someone who permanently or temporarily can only use one hand, to do everything with that hand. But to get there, we need to continue researching the complicated, interdisciplinary questions of how these devices interact with our brains."
Co-author Tamar Makin summed it up: "Evolution hasn’t prepared us to use an extra body part, and we have found that to extend our abilities in new and unexpected ways, the brain adapts the representation of the biological body."
I think what amazes me most about all this is the flexibility of the brain. The fact that it can adjust to such radical changes in inputs and outputs is phenomenal. Me, I'm waiting for something like Tony Stark's suit in Iron Man. That'd not only allow me to fight crime, but it'd make yard chores a hell of a lot easier.
Too many people think of chemistry as being arcane and difficult formulas and laws and symbols, and lose sight of the amazing reality it describes. My younger son, who is the master glassblower for the chemistry department at the University of Houston, was telling me about what he's learned about the chemistry of glass -- why it it's transparent, why different formulations have different properties, what causes glass to have the colors it does, or no color at all -- and I was astonished at not only the complexity, but how incredibly cool it is.
The world is filled with such coolness, and it's kind of sad how little we usually notice it. Colors and shapes and patterns abound, and while some of them are still mysterious, there are others that can be explained in terms of the behavior of the constituent atoms and molecules. This is the topic of the phenomenal new book The Beauty of Chemistry: Art, Wonder, and Science by Philip Ball and photographers Wenting Zhu and Yan Liang, which looks at the chemistry of the familiar, and illustrates the science with photographs of astonishing beauty.
Whether you're an aficionado of science or simply someone who is curious about the world around you, The Beauty of Chemistry is a book you will find fascinating. You'll learn a bit about the chemistry of everything from snowflakes to champagne -- and be entranced by the sheer beauty of the ordinary.
[Note: if you purchase this book from the image/link below, part of the proceeds goes to support Skeptophilia!]