Regular readers of Skeptophilia may recall that in June of last year, I wrote about an alleged psychic (at that time identified only by her nickname of "Angel") who had called the police in Liberty County, Texas, claiming that some folks living nearby had a mass grave on their property. The police, instead of doing what I would have done (which is to hang up on her), went in to check the story out.
"Checking it out" turned out to be digging up the entire yard of the two who were accused, Joe Bankson and Gena Charlton. After excavating their property with a backhoe, the police basically said, "Oh, all right, I guess there isn't a mass grave here after all," and left -- not, of course, repairing the damage. By this time, the story had gotten out to the media, and Bankson and Charlton were subjected to taunts, scorn, and threats over their alleged role in the imaginary murders.
Well, Bankson and Charlton sued the county, several media outlets, and "Angel," and (although their suits against the county and the media were dismissed) just last week won an award from "Angel" -- whose real name is Presley Rhonda Gridley -- of nearly seven million dollars.
I don't know why the suits against the county and media were dismissed. I can speculate that the reason may be that both the police, and the television stations and newspapers that covered the story, were "acting in good faith," pursuing a lead that seemed to have merit at the time. I find this unfortunate, for two reasons. First, there is a history of police turning to psychics to solve crimes -- most famously, in the case of Holly Bobo, a Tennessee woman who was abducted in 2011 and who is still missing. I can say with some authority that there has never been a case where evidence gained through "psychic abilities" has turned out to be accurate or helpful. It is reprehensible that the state of Texas is not holding the police department responsible for damaging two law-abiding citizens' reputations by acting on a "lead" that was obviously bogus.
Second, I doubt that Bankson and Charlton will ever see much of their seven million dollar award. Presley Gridley is no Sylvia Browne, with deep pockets and a large bank account. While it must be validating finally to have their defamation claims supported in a court of law, it would be nice if they were able to come out with something to show for the ordeal they've been through. The situation might be different if the suits against the county and the media had been upheld -- Bankson and Charlton would have undoubtedly been more successful at collecting at least part of the award from them.
Still, it's to be hoped that this sends a message, both to "psychics" and to anyone in the media or in law enforcement who is inclined to take their ridiculous pronouncements as fact. If you want to rip off the public by claiming you can read palms or divine with Tarot cards, or simply (as Gridley did) say you're receiving information from god and the angels, go ahead. But be careful what you say to your clients, especially when it includes accusations that could be construed as slander.
And for cryin' in the sink, police agencies, let's be clear on what the word "evidence" means. From Webster's: "evidence (n.) -- The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid." Note the word "facts" in there -- i.e., not the delusional ravings of someone who thinks (s)he's getting information from the spirit world. Hope that clarifies things for you.
Skeptophilia (skep-to-fil-i-a) (n.) - the love of logical thought, skepticism, and thinking critically. Being an exploration of the applications of skeptical thinking to the world at large, with periodic excursions into linguistics, music, politics, cryptozoology, and why people keep seeing the face of Jesus on grilled cheese sandwiches.
Showing posts with label Liberty County Sheriff's Office. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberty County Sheriff's Office. Show all posts
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Friday, June 22, 2012
The psychic and the murder accusation
What will it take for people to stop believing in psychics?
Most big-name psychics -- James van Praagh, "Psychic Sally" Morgan, Sylvia Browne, Uri Geller, John Edward -- have come under fire from skeptics, and many of them have been caught cheating (in the case of Morgan, more than once). Each time it happens, I think, "Maybe this will be it. Maybe people will stop listening, stop going to their shows, stop sending them thousands of dollars for bogus 'readings.'"
And I keep being wrong. Each time, no matter how plausible the accusation, no matter how well supported the criticism, they bounce back. "... (W)e (psychics) are here to heal people and to help people grow," van Praagh said in an interview on Larry King Live. "(S)keptics... they're just here to destroy people. They're not here to encourage people, to enlighten people. They're here to destroy people."
And their fans, bleating softly, come right back, and the money starts flowing in again.
A recent story illustrates this brilliantly -- and has me once again thinking, probably wrongly, that this will be the time people will sit back and say, "Okay, that's it. We're done with you charlatans." (Sources here and here.)
This is a tale about a psychic who calls herself "Angel" and a couple in Liberty County, Texas, north of Houston. "Angel," whose real name has yet to be released, called the Liberty County Sheriff's Office in June of last year, to report that there were 25 to 30 dismembered bodies buried on a piece of property. She directed them to the home of Joe Bankson and Gena Charlton, where she said the bodies were, and told them she'd received the information in communication directly from an actual angel.
The Sheriff's Office, astonishingly, didn't guffaw directly at "Angel" and hang up on her; they went and investigated, and in fact dug holes all over Bankson and Charlton's property looking for the alleged bodies. Meanwhile, the story of the mass burial site was picked up by local news services, and it spread -- first to Houston-based KPRC-TV, then to ABC News, and finally to Reuters, CNN, and The New York Times. All of this, based on (1) a tip from a "psychic" who heard it from an "angel," and (2) zero actual dismembered bodies.
Well, finally the police gave up, but not before Bankson and Charlton's property looked like a minefield, and the couple themselves had to defend themselves against accusations of being serial killers. As far as "Angel," the Houston Chronicle said, "The 48-year-old woman, who asked to only be identified by her nickname of Angel, said she never wanted any attention and fears the worldwide interest in the case will destroy her life if her identity is known publicly." And about her failed psychic tip, she defends herself thusly, in an interview with KHOU News of Houston:
Well, predictably, Bankson and Charlton aren't buying it. They're suing "Angel," the news outlets, and the Liberty County Sheriff's Office for defamation. Now, I'm not a huge believer in lawsuits, but this is one I'm behind 100% -- and in a fair world, it should be a slam dunk for the attorney representing Bankson and Charlton, Andrew Sommerman of Dallas. In fact, I think that Bankson and Charlton should not only win monetary damages, I think that "Angel," the Sheriff of Liberty County, and the CEOs of all of the news agencies that reported the story as legitimate news should be forced to completely re-landscape Bankson and Charlton's property using only hand tools.
But, of course, it's not a fair world. Nor is it a rational one. I don't think their lawsuit is a sure thing at all -- superstition, ignorance, and irrationality still rule the day all too often. People are sadly prone to wishful thinking, clinging to a counterfactual view of the world that still for some reason gives them comfort, and their memories are short. And if "Angel" is acquitted -- which I think is all too likely -- it wouldn't surprise me to hear that she puts her shingle back out, and will be back to passing along messages from Jesus and the angels in no time at all.
Most big-name psychics -- James van Praagh, "Psychic Sally" Morgan, Sylvia Browne, Uri Geller, John Edward -- have come under fire from skeptics, and many of them have been caught cheating (in the case of Morgan, more than once). Each time it happens, I think, "Maybe this will be it. Maybe people will stop listening, stop going to their shows, stop sending them thousands of dollars for bogus 'readings.'"
And I keep being wrong. Each time, no matter how plausible the accusation, no matter how well supported the criticism, they bounce back. "... (W)e (psychics) are here to heal people and to help people grow," van Praagh said in an interview on Larry King Live. "(S)keptics... they're just here to destroy people. They're not here to encourage people, to enlighten people. They're here to destroy people."
And their fans, bleating softly, come right back, and the money starts flowing in again.
A recent story illustrates this brilliantly -- and has me once again thinking, probably wrongly, that this will be the time people will sit back and say, "Okay, that's it. We're done with you charlatans." (Sources here and here.)
This is a tale about a psychic who calls herself "Angel" and a couple in Liberty County, Texas, north of Houston. "Angel," whose real name has yet to be released, called the Liberty County Sheriff's Office in June of last year, to report that there were 25 to 30 dismembered bodies buried on a piece of property. She directed them to the home of Joe Bankson and Gena Charlton, where she said the bodies were, and told them she'd received the information in communication directly from an actual angel.
The Sheriff's Office, astonishingly, didn't guffaw directly at "Angel" and hang up on her; they went and investigated, and in fact dug holes all over Bankson and Charlton's property looking for the alleged bodies. Meanwhile, the story of the mass burial site was picked up by local news services, and it spread -- first to Houston-based KPRC-TV, then to ABC News, and finally to Reuters, CNN, and The New York Times. All of this, based on (1) a tip from a "psychic" who heard it from an "angel," and (2) zero actual dismembered bodies.
Well, finally the police gave up, but not before Bankson and Charlton's property looked like a minefield, and the couple themselves had to defend themselves against accusations of being serial killers. As far as "Angel," the Houston Chronicle said, "The 48-year-old woman, who asked to only be identified by her nickname of Angel, said she never wanted any attention and fears the worldwide interest in the case will destroy her life if her identity is known publicly." And about her failed psychic tip, she defends herself thusly, in an interview with KHOU News of Houston:
I didn’t file a false report. If they make it to be false, that’s up to them, you know. ... I did what I was told to do. I followed what Jesus and the angels told me to do. It’s up to them from there. ... They [the police] up front asked me how I got the information, and I am a reverend. I am a prophet and I get my information from Jesus and the angels, and I told them that I had 32 angels with me and they were giving me the information.So now she's bringing in the big guns: Jesus and no less than 32 angels. Because that obviously makes it all right.
Well, predictably, Bankson and Charlton aren't buying it. They're suing "Angel," the news outlets, and the Liberty County Sheriff's Office for defamation. Now, I'm not a huge believer in lawsuits, but this is one I'm behind 100% -- and in a fair world, it should be a slam dunk for the attorney representing Bankson and Charlton, Andrew Sommerman of Dallas. In fact, I think that Bankson and Charlton should not only win monetary damages, I think that "Angel," the Sheriff of Liberty County, and the CEOs of all of the news agencies that reported the story as legitimate news should be forced to completely re-landscape Bankson and Charlton's property using only hand tools.
But, of course, it's not a fair world. Nor is it a rational one. I don't think their lawsuit is a sure thing at all -- superstition, ignorance, and irrationality still rule the day all too often. People are sadly prone to wishful thinking, clinging to a counterfactual view of the world that still for some reason gives them comfort, and their memories are short. And if "Angel" is acquitted -- which I think is all too likely -- it wouldn't surprise me to hear that she puts her shingle back out, and will be back to passing along messages from Jesus and the angels in no time at all.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)