In this case, it's a Skeptophilia frequent flier Representative Lamar Smith of Texas. Smith's virulently anti-science stance has been the topic of more than one post here, so it should come as no particular surprise that he's at it again. This time, it's an expansion of his witch hunt against people at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to locate and censure any employee who even mentions anthropogenic climate change.
Last year, Smith issued a subpoena for any internal documents that contained the words "global temperature," "climate study," "hiatus," and "haitus." He presumably included the last one not only to catch accidental misspellings, but to catch people who deliberately misspelled words so as to avoid getting caught in his word search, a technique often used by people on social media to avoid obscenity filters, as in the phrase "Lamar Smith is kind of a dcik." But this week, Smith apparently decided that he wasn't snaring enough malefactors, because he expanded his search parameters, as follows:
In addition to the search terms originally selected by NOAA, please include the following additional terms: "Karl," "buoy," "night marine air temperature," "temperature," "climate," "change," "Paris," "U.N.," "United Nations," "clean power plan," "regulations," "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)," "President," "Obama," "White House," and "Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)." In order to capture all documents responsive to the Committee's subpoena, please provide any documents responsive to these additional search terms from custodians that have previously been searched.So you're going to take an agency that studies weather and climate, and subpoena every document that mentions "temperature" and "climate?" Seems like Lamar is going to go from not catching enough evil climate change documents to catching everything. I'd love to see what happens when his subpoena results in the capture of 139,452 documents, all of which his committee then has to go through.
("Karl," by the way, is a search parameter because Thomas Karl is one of the scientists whose climate research Smith and his cronies are targeting.)
How, precisely, can this be labeled as anything but harassment? This smacks of Joseph McCarthy's sifting through people's correspondence looking for any hint of communism lurking therein. Worse, actually; because communism isn't fact, it's an ideology, and there was justification for considering what the Soviets were doing as dangerous. Here, we're talking about science, for cryin' in the sink. And as I mentioned yesterday, nature doesn't really give a flying fuck what your political stance is. You can't spin data.
What Smith et al. are doing amounts to suppressing hard evidence, akin to the spokespeople for Big Tobacco covering up evidence of the connection between smoking and lung cancer, which they did successfully for decades. People like this have no respect for the truth; they only care about furthering their own agenda, whatever the cost.
Representative Lamar Smith of Texas [image courtesy of the Wikimedia Commons]
So their solution to having scientific findings that fly in the face of the way they'd like the world to work is to persecute the scientists. Unfortunately, this approach doesn't work. As we've established all too often, the universe doesn't care if you're happy or not. Put a different way, we have the trenchant quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson: "The nice thing about science is that it works whether you believe in it or not."