This tendency on the part of Americans to assume that democracy means that all ideas are equal, and everyone's utterances equally valid, often drives us to do ridiculous things. We discount the conclusions of scientists, preferring instead the evidence-free declarations of politicians, actors, and athletes. The criticism "they don't understand the common, working-class people" is frequently lobbed in the direction of the intelligent. This sense that the well-educated are either impractical or else actively evil leads us to elect the unqualified because they "seem like regular folks," even though you'd think we'd all want our leaders to be selected from the best and smartest we have. But somehow there's this sense that being smart, well-educated, and thoroughly trained gives the experts an ivory-tower insulation from the rest of us slobs, and probably leaves them immoral as well.
What it actually accomplishes, though, is to give your average guy the idea that he knows a great deal more than he really does. Called the Dunning-Kruger effect, it makes the unskilled overestimate their knowledge and underestimate their ineptitude. And just yesterday, I ran into a new phenomenon that illustrates that amazingly well: do-it-yourself orthodonture.
I'm not making this up. Put off by the high costs of orthodontic treatment, the inconvenience of having braces (sometimes for years), and the mystery of how a few brackets and wires could straighten out crooked teeth, people have said, "Hey, I could do that." Now that 3-D printing is easy and cheap, people print themselves out resin brackets, affix them to their teeth with glue, and start yanking. Lured by testimony that such a course of treatment could reduce the costs to under $100 and shorten the duration of brace-wearing from three years to as little as sixteen weeks, the idea has been spreading like wildfire.
[image courtesy of photographer Jason Regan and the Wikimedia Commons]
I’d like to see an X-ray, because he’s probably caused some irreparable harm. He moved these teeth in only 16 weeks. You can cause a lot of problems with that. If you move a tooth too fast, you can actually cause damage to the bone and gums. And if you don’t put the tooth in the right position, you could throw off your bite.And why did Dudley take on his own orthodontic work? "Because," he said, "I wanted to stick it to the dental appliance industry."
A stance that apparently gave him the impression that he knew enough to start shoving around his own teeth.
I find this attitude impossible to understand. I consider myself reasonably intelligent, but I know I'm not smart enough to be responsible for my own medical care. Similarly, I know I don't have the training to understand the latest scientific findings in most fields, nor to come up with solutions to the nation's economic problems and foreign policy. This is why we have experts.
Which is why it really pisses me off when someone comes up with the latest pseudo-clever meme about how to fix everything, such as this one:
When I first saw this one -- and it's been posted far and wide -- my first thought was, "Can't you do simple arithmetic?" If you don't see what I mean, try this: let's raise the salaries of the soldiers and seniors to, say, $50,000 a year. Accepting the numbers they've quoted here, this would require an extra $12,000 for each soldier and an extra $38,000 for each senior. Multiply each of these by the number of active-duty soldiers (1,388,000) and seniors on Social Security (59,000,000) in the United States, respectively, to see how much money we'd need.
Then, using a similar calculation, figure out how much we'd save yearly by cutting the wages of retired presidents (of which there are currently four -- Carter, Bush Sr., Clinton, and Bush Jr. You can even be generous and throw in Obama if you like), the House and Senate members (535 of them), the Speaker of the House (1), and the Majority and Minority leaders of each branch of congress (4), down to $50,000 each. See how much you save.
Falls a little short, doesn't it?
I mean, for cryin' in the sink, people. If it was that easy, don't you think someone would have thought of this by now?
Which may seem a long way from do-it-yourself braces, but it's all the same thing, really; the attitude that a completely untrained individual is just as good as an expert at solving complex problems. The cult of ignorance is still thriving here in the United States. But despite our desire to think that everyone's ideas are on equal footing, ignorance will never be as good as knowledge.
In addition to the illogic, all of these numbers are wrong. http://truthandkindness.org/posts/pres-pension/ReplyDelete
Interesting book from the mid-60s on the same topic: Richard Hofstadter's Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. I re-read it a few years ago, and its observations still ring true.ReplyDelete
The idea of DIY orthodontics makes me feel sick. I HAD braces.ReplyDelete
With respect to the meme, I never read it as an argument that the income of soldiers and seniors should be raised. I read it as an argument that if we are going to make a cut, it should be from the guaranteed income of the politicians, and not from social security. Now, that in and of itself isn't a bad argument.
On my calculations, you'd save roughly $60 million annually by cutting these salaries to $50k a year. That's using averaged numbers, because I didn't have the time to do it properly. Now you can save the same by cutting social security by a small amount to a larger number of people, but socially it's abhorrent to take from the poorest when the richest have far more than they need.
The real question this meme is asking, to my mind, is: "Is the expense really justified? Why do those people need that money? Maybe we could save the whole lot of it?"
Those politicians have superannuation, yeah? (I forget what you call it, the guaranteed retirement income savings). Their super should be quite large if they've had large salaries. Now pensioners only get their miserly sum if they have no other resources, but politicians pensions aren't means-tested. Why not? Why do they get more when they START with more? There is also, of course, a fundamental conflict of interest in the sense that government officials vote on their own incomes and pensions, even though they are motivated to give themselves more to the detriment of taxpayers.
Personally I think you could mount a decent argument that government pensions should either be abolished completely, or otherwise massively reduced.
Perfect post, I have an overbite and my dentist still doesn't recommend me getting braces but I badly want to fix my bite. What should I do?ReplyDelete