The legislation would "prevent the government from intruding or abridging faith-based beliefs," stating explicitly that "laws neutral toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as laws intended to interfere with religious exercise."
Opponents of the bill were well aware of its hidden agenda.
Senator Curt Thomas, who voted against the bill, said that he believed that the measure was a direct response to the spread of marriage equality laws in the United States. "There’s no way anyone’s going to convince me that that’s not what’s happening now," Thomas said. He made reference to similar measures that have been instituted in Alabama, where the state Supreme Court just ordered judges to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. "We don’t want to be the next Alabama and be the next circus that they are becoming."
He was not the only one who recognized the law's subtext. Marty Rouse, National Field Director of the Human Rights Campaign, was even more blunt than Thomas. "This bill is a reprehensible attack on LGBT people and their families in Georgia," Rouse said, in a statement released last Thursday. "It does not address any legitimate problem with current law and creates harmful consequences for businesses throughout the state. It threatens not just the LGBT community, but women, members of minority faiths and other minority classes. All Georgians deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and we need all fair-minded people in the state to help stop this bill."
It now goes to the Georgia House of Representatives, where it is expected to pass, and then be signed into law by Governor Nathan Deal.
The whole thing has LGBT advocates seething, for understandable reasons. Religious rights have been cited more than once in the past few months as reasonable justification for denial of services to LGBT individuals, and the RFRA is expected to give the anti-LGBT crowd legal standing in doing so. But given the wide support the bill has in the Georgia legislature, what can be done?
Just ask the Aquarian Tabernacle Wiccan Church.
In a statement that should go down in the Annals of the History of Bluff-Calling, the Aquarian Tabernacle Church thanked the Georgia policymakers for their "forward-thinking... dedication to religious freedom." They then outlined their practices that would be protected under the RFRA, citing which lines of the legislation covered each of them. These practices included:
- Polyamory. "Marriage is a religious institution," the statement reads. "A uniting of souls before the almighty... Many Wiccans live in multi-partner households, and until now have been unable to realize their religious right to marry the partners they are in love with. Many of these partnerships have children from multiple partners all living under the same roof. SB 129 has now opened the way for those children to all be under family insurance/health plans, as outlined in lines [22-23]. And if lines [34-35] hold true to their intent, then the least restrictive means of enforcing this change, is a simple revision to existing policy."
- Ingestion of psychotropic plants. "With the passing of GRFRA," says the statement, "the ATC will be informing all Wiccans within the state of GA that there are no longer restrictions on which plants they may grow, own, harvest, ingest, distribute, or refine into compounds that the practitioner finds need to use within their religious practice, so long as no other laws besides substance abuse are broken... As Government's definition also includes lines [82-83] “authorities; [...] or other person acting under color of law” it should be a matter of course to inform all officials to begin their refrain from detaining the practitioners for, and impeding the lawful use of said plants and animal parts. This includes, but is no way limited to this non-comprehensive list, all plants currently residing upon any list of banned substances, plus any and all animal parts that may be found on the property or in the possession of anyone practicing the faith of Wicca within Georgia State limits."
- Drug screening by employers, and other restrictions based on "bodily sanctity." "[The RFRA] means that all Wiccans are to be free to choose to be exempt, at the individual’s discretion regarding the sanctity of their essence, with no repercussions from Government bodies [77-83] upon an employer adhering to these inalienable religious rights, from urinalysis, blood tests, hair follicle tests, breathalyzers, tattooing, rfid chipping, or anything else that adds to or removes parts of our essence."
Man. This should be good. How many times do the clowns in elected office have to be shown that "freedom of religion" doesn't mean "freedom for the majority religion to do whatever it damn well pleases, and to hell with everyone else?" Perhaps this will finally get it through their thick skulls that religious freedom (1) doesn't trump anti-discrimination laws, and (2) works best when the government just keeps its grimy paws off of religion entirely. People should be free to practice whatever religion they want, in whatever way they want, unless such practice contravenes existing federal or state laws. And that includes laws against discrimination.
How hard is that?
I certainly hope that the Aquarian Tabernacle Church pushes this as far as they can. They seem to have done their homework, and although I can't say I buy their worldview, I applaud what they're doing, here. And I don't know about you, but I'm really looking forward to seeing the legislators in Georgia backpedaling like mad to undo what they've done once they realize its implications.
I disagree that whether something is legal should be the guiding principle. There are unjust laws that deserve to be ignored whether on religious grounds or not. Rather, I'd say people should be free to practice their religion, but not to penalize others for not following its precepts.ReplyDelete
How do I sign up to become Wiccan??ReplyDelete