... statues of Mothman.
West Virginia high school teacher Jay Sisson explains:
To many West Virginians, Mothman carries more significance than any Confederate general. In fact, the legend originated in the town of Point Pleasant, when locals spotted a “man-sized bird creature” prior to the 1967 Silver Bridge collapse that killed 46 people. Mothman was blamed and retroactively seen as a bad omen that foreshadowed the disaster. From there, the story of the Mothman spread across the country and became an urban legend of sorts.Twitter user Brenna (@HumanBrennapede) has an additional reason for preferring Mothman; unlike most Confederate generals, she says, Mothman has "a six-pack and an objectively good ass." The statue of the creature in Point Pleasant, West Virginia, illustrates this:
And I have to admit she's right that he has quite a shapely posterior. It does remind me, however, of my days teaching Ancient Greek to high schoolers. One of my classes complained to me one day that they were sick of learning phrases of limited modern utility like "O Zeus, accept my sacrifice" and "Prometheus's liver is being devoured by an eagle."
"Well, what do you want to learn how to say?" I asked.
One boy said, "How about, 'You have a nice ass.'"
I shrugged and said, "Okay. It'd be, 'kalein pygian ekheis.'" (Transliterated roughly into English letters.)
They all laughed, and I added, "I guess if you know how to say, 'you have a nice ass,' you'd better learn how to say 'thank you.'" So I had them repeat after me, 'sas eukharisto.'"
At this point, the class was in hysterics. Something seemed off -- it wasn't that funny. So I turned around...
... and the principal was standing in the doorway.
Fortunately, he has an awesome sense of humor, and joined in the laughter at my obvious discombobulation. And the students used that as their greeting to each other in the hall for the rest of the school year: "Kalein pygian ekheis." "Sas eukharisto!"
Never let it be said that I didn't make an impact as a teacher.
But I digress.
Anyhow, I think the Mothman statue idea is brilliant. It could be applied to lots of other states, too, each of which has its own terrifying and inhuman monster. Florida could have statues of the Skunk Ape. Louisiana has the Grunch. Arkansas has the Boggy Creek Monster. Kentucky has Mitch McConnell.
You get the idea.
So that would solve the problem of injuring state pride, and focus people's attention away from a bunch of military leaders who (to be brutally frank) lost anyhow.
But I'm not expecting it to catch on. Inspired ideas usually don't. Even ones that involve making statues of a creature with "an objectively good ass."
I know I sometimes wax rhapsodic about books that really are the province only of true science geeks like myself, and fling around phrases like "a must-read" perhaps a little more liberally than I should. But this week's Skeptophilia book recommendation of the week is really a must-read.
No, I mean it this time.
Kathryn Schulz's book Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error is something that everyone should read, because it points out the remarkable frailty of the human mind. As wonderful as it is, we all (as Schulz puts it) "walk around in a comfortable little bubble of feeling like we're absolutely right about everything." We accept that we're fallible, in a theoretical sense; yeah, we all make mistakes, blah blah blah. But right now, right here, try to think of one think you might conceivably be wrong about.
Not as easy as it sounds.
She shocks the reader pretty much from the first chapter. "What does it feel like to be wrong?" she asks. Most of us would answer that it can be humiliating, horrifying, frightening, funny, revelatory, infuriating. But she points out that these are actually answers to a different question: "what does it feel like to find out you're wrong?"
Actually, she tells us, being wrong doesn't feel like anything. It feels exactly like being right.
Reading Schulz's book makes the reader profoundly aware of our own fallibility -- but it is far from a pessimistic book. Error, Schulz says, is the window to discovery and the source of creativity. It is only when we deny our capacity for error that the trouble starts -- when someone in power decides that (s)he is infallible.
Then we have big, big problems.
So right now, get this book. I promise I won't say the same thing next week about some arcane tome describing the feeding habits of sea slugs. You need to read Being Wrong.
[Note: if you purchase this book using the image/link below, part of the proceeds goes to support Skeptophilia!]